Feedback should be limited where communication issues could be due to language. For example, helping with sentence phrasing is okay; helping with professional language is okay; so is help with syntax, grammar, and word choice. Examples of what is not okay would be helping with structural changes, references, idea formation, or rewriting of research. If a paper has had feedback on such topics from a reviewer you have leeway to decide whether to assist or not. If authors are struggling to understand feedback from a review, helping to clarify it as you understand it is encouraged. A reminder, papers have already been through the review process. The idea isn’t to give people a potentially unfair advantage for acceptance to NIME, but to help accepted authors at a language disadvantage ensure a good publication. If you find yourself questioning whether something is appropriate, please ask.